BY KEITH JACKSON
IN AUGUST 2007, former Bougainville
District Commissioner Bill Brown MBE [pictured in 1968] wrote to the Department
of Foreign Affairs in Canberra pointing point out a major error that had
appeared in the book, Documents on Australian Foreign Policy, Australia and
Papua New Guinea 1966 – 1969.
Bill Brown
The
book was composed largely of official documents and, very much like the
Wikileaks cables of more recent times, allowed rare insights into the words and
actions of Australian politicians and bureaucrats in the three or so years it
covered.
But
when Bill Brown read the book he was particularly struck by documents that
covered the time he was serving his nation in colonial Bougainville. It was a
turbulent time and the role of the kiap in trying to educate people about what
would happen to their land with the arrival of the Panguna copper and gold mine
was a particularly difficult one.
There
were about 20 kiaps directly involved with the establishment of the mine and,
without exception, they were a voice of knowledge and reason in the face of
corporate intransigence, academic insouciance and an Australian government
driven by the desire to give PNG resource exploitation at all costs.
The
views of these men is perhaps best articulated in an interview kiap Ross
Henderson gave to Film Australia in 1969, when he said:
It
did not surprise anyone that the Moronis were angry over the land situation. It
is not just a block of dirt to them - it is part of the body and the soul.
Their whole social system is based on land. The land is owned by the ancestors
now dead, the present occupiers and by the unborn generations to come. The
occupiers have the right to use the land, to lease, but not to destroy.
From
as early as 1966 we have been telling all the villages as much as we knew of
the project, and tried to put them into the picture …. It was difficult even
for us to envisage what was going to happen. You can imagine how bewildering it
must have been for the Moronis.
But
many subsequent writers on those times, times which led to the bloody civil war
in Bougainville that resulted in something like 20,000 deaths, compounding
their lack of first hand research with a too easy acceptance of official
documents, did the kiaps a great disservice.
The
kiaps were blamed for things they did not do, and accused of doing things that,
knowing what they knew, they would never have done.
So
in 2007, so many years later, when Bill Brown saw the errors entrenched in the
official documents of that earlier time, he decided to tackle Canberra and get
the bureaucrats to address the errors and distortions of the documents.
The
initial response from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade was
encouraging:
You
are quite correct in your analysis of the errors which flow from the mistaken
heading to Document 307. … Sir David, with whom I have friendly relations, has
made me aware of the issue and we've come to an agreement on how to correct the
record.
When
we release these publications, we are aware that they will be carefully
scrutinised and we do our best to make them accurate. But anything of this size
and complexity will never be perfect. ... All this means that we need to be
courageous enough to keep putting things into the public domain and also that
we should be humble enough to welcome observations from our readers - and
particularly from historical participants such as yourself.
Well,
pretensions to accuracy, courage and gratitude were soon betrayed by the
reality of a Department that would prefer to leave lies on the record than to
admit error. As Bill Brown writes in the paper Bougainville Texts - Some
Flaws In The Shards, which you can download below:
In
2007, Sir David Hay was told that a clarification would appear in the next
volume, to be published in a year or so, and that a correction would be put on
the DFAT website in the immediate future. Sir David waited, and he died. If he
had not, he would still be waiting. Foreign Affairs updated their website, but
made no correction and did not admit the error.
Even
today, the Department is still promoting the book “Documents on Australian
Foreign Policy, Australia and Papua New Guinea 1966 – 1969” as “a detailed
record of the classified communications that informed and determined Australian
policy in Papua New Guinea between 1966 and 1969.” There is no admission of
error or flaw, and there is no correction.
“People
have suggested that the Australian government has been niggardly
in acknowledging the role played by kiaps,” writes Bill elsewhere. Niggardly?
That’s putting it mildly. The term I’d use is “bloody disgraceful”.
Anyway,
you can read Bill Brown’s compilation here – an invaluable contribution to the
history of a troubled island and a welcome clarification of the kiaps’ role in
those years between the mid sixties and mid seventies when they did their level
best for the people of Bougainville.
Best
turned out to be not good enough, but the blame cannot be sheeted home to those
20 or so kiaps. You’ve got to look a lot further south for that.
Retrieved from: Keith Jackson & Friends: PNG ATTITUDE (http://asopa.typepad.com/asopa_people/2011/11/kiaps-and-the-panguna-mine-the-truth-revealed.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment