Leonard Fong Roka
What game is Anthony Reagan playing on Bougainville for
Bougainvilleans?
When the Panguna people fought against the brutal
exploitation of Bougainville wealth to built Australia’s buffer state of Papua
New Guinea that hosted a people that were not ethnically and geographically
relatives of Bougainvilleans, Australia was up against the Solomon Island
people of Bougainville and supported the PNG people.
Bougainvilleans stood up to shut the Panguna mine that was
building PNG and not Bougainville. The analogy is that Bougainville was rich in
the media and the few urban centers but in reality, Bougainville was the
poorest island with no infrastructure, proper government system to sustain
progress. Bougainville was marching to its grave yard festooned beautiful
flowers.
Australia and PNG loved the pre-crisis Bougainville
direction of development that was based on exploitation that was sustained by
institutional indoctrination to subject the Bougainville nation into a field of
genocide.
The pair proofed it when the Bougainville people revolted
since 1988.
Australia and PNG had the dream to eradicate the people of
Bougainville in their 10 year total blockade on Bougainville to take control of
the massive seven mines that Bougainville is sitting on. Since Panguna mine was
the financial river of PNG, it indicated that the next 6 mines were as positive
in terms of profiteering for Australia and PNG.
But Bougainvilleans stood to the harsh Australia and PNG
rage against them.
Thus reaching a moment in the life of Bougainvilleans that
their tiny island states like Solomon Islands, Vanuatu with the backing of only
one responsible state in the Pacific, New Zealand; other humanitarian
organizations like churches and individuals of the Pacific and the
international community began advocating for peace in the midst of the divided
Bougainville people that were fighting each other whilst the Australia armed
PNG army turned into a sitting logistical provider.
Peace did not suffer resistance for the island since
Bougainville was a nation that people knew and accepted each other. So when
Bougainville kept their guns away and peace slowly wrapped the island making
Australia thinking.
Australia is a hegemonic state in the South Pacific. It
cannot let go its status that easily to another rival state, for example, China
and be seen as a bystander in its own doorsteps from exploiting the tiny
Pacific island states.
Thus Australia dived into the peace effort on Bougainville
under a new skin of friendship for the post-conflict Bougainville population to
welcome it as a big brother. Of course, it is the regions big brother, but no
state or person enters into a partnership without its interest to get its slice
of the cake.
With all care, Australia helps Bougainville create the
Bougainville Peace Agreement (2001); Australia support Bougainville creates it
autonomous government system and so on. But as it stands behind Bougainville,
Australia is seeing that Bougainvilleans turn to built laws that will deter or
narrow its interest on Bougainville.
To this, an academically well versed Anthony Reagan comes
into play.
Consider this and look at Mr. Reagan and the Autonomous
Bougainville Government (ABG) of the day: ‘Experts at the banks will come after
you. It’s their job to punch holes in your forecasts—that’s what they’re paid
to do. Making you look bad makes them look good.’ Confessions of the Economic Hit Man by John Perkins (2004: Page
17).
Anthony Reagan is punching holes in Bougainvillean psyche
and achievements making the ABG look bad and making outside interest and
directive look beautiful thus ABG is
backing outside interest and not a Bougainville oriented approach to
development of Bougainville.
Such a trend paves way for exploitation. That is
Bougainvilleans still will not own the land they died for since ABG is vowing
to foreign interests that the very good examples on the ground are Anthony
Reagan and Lindsay Semple.
Recently in Bougainville
Forum (Facebook) Anthony Reagan preached all his credentials of working on
Bougainville and admitted that, ‘It’s
true that AusAID has paid for my work in Bougainville.’
In this
day and age, political leaders are puppets and the real decision makers in
politics are the financial institutions, multinational corporations, and so on.
So we have to ask as Bougainvilleans how many financial tentacles has AusAID
has? BCL and Rio Tinto are both Australian multinational corporations!
So
nothing is hidden when Anthony Reagan is struggling hard to influence and mould
the outcome of the Bougainville mining bill.
Panguna
Mine Affected Landowners Association (PMALA) chairman, Lawrence Daveona,
emailed his executives that, ‘we must collectively defend the "Stolen Rights" for our
people. We must remember that Blood has been spilled in our struggle for Land
rights. You all know the rest of the story. It is now or never as long as
people like Mr. Tony Regan and Professor Cieran who are on the payroll of
AUSAID as advisors to ABG keep carrying on their misguided information to us
under the cover of "Workshops" for us the Landowners.’
People
are seeing and feeling the whole problem Bougainville is now faced with: the
reckless roaming of an economic hit man to kill Bougainville ownership of the
land and its livelihood. They are here to put foreign interest ahead of
Bougainville’s loss of 15 to 20 000 of its innocent people that perish under
Australian support of its friend, PNG and its brutality on the island.
Another
American sympathetic to Bougainvilleans, Dr. David E. Martin of the University
of Virginia wrote in Inverted Alchemy blog that, ‘In an elaborate scheme
reminiscent of the first theft of Bougainville’s assets, Mr. Regan has complied
with the wishes of his paymasters and drafted a new mining bill that preserves
nearly all the abuses embodied in the 1967 Act. To add insult to injury, his
proposed bill reinforces the corruption quotient by burying in Clause 26 the
nullification of the over 200 provisions with the simple empowerment of the
Autonomous Bougainville Government to act unilaterally and without
consideration of any law as it wishes. Using his “constitutional” expertise,
he’s taken to the U.S. government’s definition of Constitutional Law – if it is
expedient, do it and tread on the Constitution to get what you want.’
The
ABG’s mining minister, Michael Oni from Panguna, is now a puppet in the House
of Representatives. He has no ownership of the bill played around by Anthony
Reagan. It was not Michael Oni that presented the bill in parliament but
Anthony Reagan.
In
such a rush Anthony Reagan also abused the Bougainville Constitution twice but
nothing has being done by the ABG.
The
Bougainville Copper Agreement 1967 that allowed the exploitation,
indoctrination and genocide of the Bougainville people is now trying to come
back with the blessing of the ABG and the economic and political hit man
Anthony Reagan.
No comments:
Post a Comment