From: The National, Wednesday 18th April 2012
THE range of complex issues surrounding Papua New Guinea’s national election have been widely commented on by Australian media and politicians – some more helpful and diplomatic than others.
In the week before Easter, I visited PNG – my second extended visit to the country in the past nine months – accompanied by Queensland federal colleagues senator Ian McDonald and MPs Jane Prentice and Ewen Jones.
We held discussions with Prime Minister Peter O’Neill, senior members of his cabinet, the leader of the opposition, the chief of the PNG Defence Force, the police commissioner and the PNG election commissioner, among others, on the many and varied challenges associated with the election.
Papua New Guinea is a democracy and as a member of the Commonwealth of Nations is committed to regular parliamentary elections and strong democratic institutions, yet recent political events have been challenging.
Current indications are that the election will be held mid-year with hopefully many of the constitutional issues surrounding the composition of the government and a dispute with the judiciary being resolved by PNG voters at the ballot box.
What is less well known is that there is another vote that will take place in the coming years in Bougainville, an autonomous region of PNG, that is potentially of far greater significance to PNG and the broader region than the general election this year.
The Bougainville peace agreement, signed in 2001 between the PNG government and the leaders of Bougainville, brought a formal end to a civil war that had cost many lives in Bougainville over decades.
Bitter conflicts over land rights, the closure of the mainstay of the local economy in the Panguna mine in the late 1980s and a nascent secession movement has meant that Bougainville has presented a challenge to the fragile nature of PNG nationhood and its politics since PNG independence in 1975.
However, part of the 2001 agreement, which was brokered in part by the Howard government, provides for a referendum to be held between 2015 and 2020 on the question of Bougainville’s independence from PNG.
Various conditions must be met prior to the referendum, notably the disposal of weapons currently held in Bougainville and an acceptable standard of governance achieved by the Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG).
Put simply, this vote will determine whether Bougainville pushes ahead for full independence or chooses to remain an autonomous region of PNG.
Yet, the complexity of the issues in Bougainville, and as between the ABG and PNG, means that as the referendum date draws nearer, Bougainville will again inevitably feature prominently in Australia’s foreign policy considerations.
The process of negotiation between the ABG and PNG is fraught with difficulties as there appear to be deeply entrenched differences over the future of Bougainville, the possibility of reopening the Panguna mine and the direction of economic and social development.
As Anthony Regan, a leading expert on Bougainville, has stated, the starkly different views that are held by Bougainville leaders and the PNG government, gives rise “to possibilities of conflict over the referendum outcome”.
Aware of the challenges facing Bougainville and the importance of engaging with all relevant parties at the earliest opportunity, our trip to PNG included a number of days in Bougainville to gain a deeper understanding of the complex web of cultural, social, economic and political issues that lie at the heart of the referendum question.
During our stay in Buka, we met with leaders of the ABG including President John Momis and Vice-President Patrick Nisira to discuss progress of the peace process, weapons disposal and economic development.
While the 2001 agreement resulted in the destruction of many weapons used in the civil war, there are fears that a significant number of weapons are still held in the community.
Further, the military ordnance left in southern Bougainville by the United States during World War II in the Pacific is an ever present danger.
We made a seven-hour round journey by boat and four-wheel drive to Arawa, the pre-civil war capital of Bougainville, to meet with people involved in the reconciliation process including members of the ABG Regional Administration and a representative from the Mekamui people, a tribe who had not taken part in the 2001 agreement.
The reality of the civil war and the bridges that have to be crossed before the referendum can take place were brought home to me in our meeting with former members of the Bougainville Revolutionary Army, Sam Kauona and Ishmael Toroama.
Kauona, a Bougainvillean but also an Australian army trained former PNGDF lieutenant and explosives expert, who became one of the most-feared guerrilla fighters in the civil war, told me that he had been “rehabilitated” and that he was now committed to peace and reconciliation.
However, he was also deeply committed to an independent Bougainville and he is not alone in his views.
We saw the work funded by Australia’s foreign aid programme to improve basic infrastructure across the islands, as well as improving governance, education and health standards.
However, the massive challenge of achieving an independent Bougainville should not be underestimated.
Whether the preconditions for the referendum will be met within the timeframe remains to be seen, but this will be a crucial test for the people of Bougainville and the PNG government.
Australia must be, and be seen to be, deeply committed to the peace and reconciliation process in the lead up to 2015 and beyond.
Sourced from: http://www.thenational.com.pg/?q=node/31596
In the week before Easter, I visited PNG – my second extended visit to the country in the past nine months – accompanied by Queensland federal colleagues senator Ian McDonald and MPs Jane Prentice and Ewen Jones.
We held discussions with Prime Minister Peter O’Neill, senior members of his cabinet, the leader of the opposition, the chief of the PNG Defence Force, the police commissioner and the PNG election commissioner, among others, on the many and varied challenges associated with the election.
Papua New Guinea is a democracy and as a member of the Commonwealth of Nations is committed to regular parliamentary elections and strong democratic institutions, yet recent political events have been challenging.
Current indications are that the election will be held mid-year with hopefully many of the constitutional issues surrounding the composition of the government and a dispute with the judiciary being resolved by PNG voters at the ballot box.
What is less well known is that there is another vote that will take place in the coming years in Bougainville, an autonomous region of PNG, that is potentially of far greater significance to PNG and the broader region than the general election this year.
The Bougainville peace agreement, signed in 2001 between the PNG government and the leaders of Bougainville, brought a formal end to a civil war that had cost many lives in Bougainville over decades.
Bitter conflicts over land rights, the closure of the mainstay of the local economy in the Panguna mine in the late 1980s and a nascent secession movement has meant that Bougainville has presented a challenge to the fragile nature of PNG nationhood and its politics since PNG independence in 1975.
However, part of the 2001 agreement, which was brokered in part by the Howard government, provides for a referendum to be held between 2015 and 2020 on the question of Bougainville’s independence from PNG.
Various conditions must be met prior to the referendum, notably the disposal of weapons currently held in Bougainville and an acceptable standard of governance achieved by the Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG).
Put simply, this vote will determine whether Bougainville pushes ahead for full independence or chooses to remain an autonomous region of PNG.
Yet, the complexity of the issues in Bougainville, and as between the ABG and PNG, means that as the referendum date draws nearer, Bougainville will again inevitably feature prominently in Australia’s foreign policy considerations.
The process of negotiation between the ABG and PNG is fraught with difficulties as there appear to be deeply entrenched differences over the future of Bougainville, the possibility of reopening the Panguna mine and the direction of economic and social development.
As Anthony Regan, a leading expert on Bougainville, has stated, the starkly different views that are held by Bougainville leaders and the PNG government, gives rise “to possibilities of conflict over the referendum outcome”.
Aware of the challenges facing Bougainville and the importance of engaging with all relevant parties at the earliest opportunity, our trip to PNG included a number of days in Bougainville to gain a deeper understanding of the complex web of cultural, social, economic and political issues that lie at the heart of the referendum question.
During our stay in Buka, we met with leaders of the ABG including President John Momis and Vice-President Patrick Nisira to discuss progress of the peace process, weapons disposal and economic development.
While the 2001 agreement resulted in the destruction of many weapons used in the civil war, there are fears that a significant number of weapons are still held in the community.
Further, the military ordnance left in southern Bougainville by the United States during World War II in the Pacific is an ever present danger.
We made a seven-hour round journey by boat and four-wheel drive to Arawa, the pre-civil war capital of Bougainville, to meet with people involved in the reconciliation process including members of the ABG Regional Administration and a representative from the Mekamui people, a tribe who had not taken part in the 2001 agreement.
The reality of the civil war and the bridges that have to be crossed before the referendum can take place were brought home to me in our meeting with former members of the Bougainville Revolutionary Army, Sam Kauona and Ishmael Toroama.
Kauona, a Bougainvillean but also an Australian army trained former PNGDF lieutenant and explosives expert, who became one of the most-feared guerrilla fighters in the civil war, told me that he had been “rehabilitated” and that he was now committed to peace and reconciliation.
However, he was also deeply committed to an independent Bougainville and he is not alone in his views.
We saw the work funded by Australia’s foreign aid programme to improve basic infrastructure across the islands, as well as improving governance, education and health standards.
However, the massive challenge of achieving an independent Bougainville should not be underestimated.
Whether the preconditions for the referendum will be met within the timeframe remains to be seen, but this will be a crucial test for the people of Bougainville and the PNG government.
Australia must be, and be seen to be, deeply committed to the peace and reconciliation process in the lead up to 2015 and beyond.
Sourced from: http://www.thenational.com.pg/?q=node/31596
No comments:
Post a Comment