Leonard Fong Roka
The late Bougainville
leader, Francis Ona, had stated this agenda by saying in the Darren Bender
& Mike Chamberlain 1999 film documentary, Coconut Revolution, that: ‘My fighting on Bougainville [is] based
on these factors: (1) that is, we are fighting for man and his culture, and (2)
land and environment; and (3) one is, independence.’ Thus the said issues
facing Bougainville that are exploitation, indoctrination and genocide were
boosted by BCL mining in Panguna and the PNG ignorance of Bougainville cry
since the 1960s.
In fact Bougainville
struggled for self determination and its push on maximization of shares in its
resources that were exploited by PNG as off 1963 led Bougainvilleans in Panguna
to stand against the injustice thus in 1988 armed protest was the solution to
show BCL and PNG that for Bougainvilleans, nothing should come in between them
and their land resulting in the loss of 10-15 thousand Bougainville people and
loss of property.
The art of war was new
since the Second World War era population was not around to educate the young
and Bougainville through time fighting the Australia-trained PNG army,
Bougainville learned and got access to PNG military resources. Bougainville
also re-conditioned WW2 ammunition and guns and used them against the enemy,
the PNG military might.
And the former BRA
general commander, Samuel Kauona defended this well. In the 1999 film
documentary, Bougainville: Our Island our
fight, Sam Kauona said, ‘All weapons that the BRA has presently are from
the Papua New Guinea Defence Force. Like my weapon…there are now hundreds and
hundreds of them at this point of time.’ This signifies that the BRA learned
the art of warfare and took on the PNG government; in due process, the number
of weapons on Bougainville increased with the fighter so loving the weapon he
took at high risk.
It was a ten year civil
war and generations of youngsters grew up and joined in the fighting that even
the PNG army was demoralized thus getting the pro-PNG resistance fighters
killing them or just snatching their weapons and joining the BRA.
Rapidly born was the
gun-culture across Bougainville and Maryanne Moses, a refugee, clearly stated
this by saying in the Bougainville: Our
island our fight, that, ‘We have deprive the children from what was
rightfully theirs; children are growing up without [formal] education, they are
in a war situation…and that’s all they know.’ Evident throughout the war was
the growing love of guns for so many reasons.
After many failed peace
initiatives as seen in the website, Bougainville Copper Limited article, Brief History of the Bougainville Crisis,
the Bougainville Peace Agreement, after a series of talks starting from the
Honiara Accord of 1994, the Arawa Peace Conference of 1994 and the
establishment of the Bougainville Transitional Government (1995) under the
leadership of BRA advisor late Theodore Miriung who was later assassinated by
the PNG army, was reached and signed in 2001.
The Bougainville Peace
Agreement, unlike other previous peace initiatives, had more concrete emphasis
on the gun-culture and the guns now available across Bougainville; it stands frankly
that Bougainville must be free from guns.
It is stated that the
Bougainville referendum to be held between 2015 and 2020 will be carried out
when certain conditions are met; one of which is that Bougainville must be
weapon free. These conditions are in Bougainville Peace Agreement’s Paragraph
312 (b) weapons disposal and good governance. The reason for these demands is
one purpose and that is Paragraph 317 (The referendum will be free and fair).
But so far these
directives had not being upheld by the ex-combatants and the new set of
Bougainvilleans that love to own a gun. Many blame the Autonomous Bougainville
Government for not putting efforts as one Bougainvillean lawyer said in Aloysius Laukai 2010 story, No Bougainville referendum until weapons are
gone, in New Dawn in Bougainville notes ‘He said
although the referendum is guaranteed under the PNG and Bougainville
constitutions there first must be weapons disposal before it can take place.’
But does this goes well with all ex-combatants? Most Bougainvilleans that never
set foot on Bougainville turn to be so vocal myopically. This is a question
that is yet to be answered, though.
To many
ex-combatants the ABG should now look at the Bougainville crisis through a
Bougainville lens since the issue is still fresh in the hearts and minds of
people. The so popularized 50-50 success of the UN backed weapons disposal has
a reason and as Bougainvillean it is about time politicians recognized that and
act.
There are
still sources of conflict in the midst of Bougainvilleans as to how the ABG
should function and how the peace agreement should treat Bougainville. And to Anthony
Regan, in his 2010 book, Light
Intervention: Lessons from Bougainville, he stated, ‘Despite agreements, diverse
sources of tension and conflict usually tend to simmer, even once the main
conflict is resolved—the previous intensity just finds new outlets.’ This is a
normal situation for crisis environments and hope Bougainville is through these
stages.
Yet on
Bougainville many ex-combatants purposely do not want to throw away their guns and
Anthony Regan is coming short here; and their point is that their life was
risked to win these guns from the PNG government forces or others want their
tales of war be recorded for the future; or that the main ambition of the
war—independence—is not yet achieved.
A notable
Meekamui group leader Chris Uma is one such figure against the weapon disposal
exercise. He told Al Jazeera TV
(2009) film, Bougainville: Reopening the
old wounds, that ‘...I fought the PNGDF, I got the rifle. I grab it from
the enemy [and] that is why I cannot give my arms. People who are putting their
arms to containment [are] stupid.’ There is also a new wave of combatants
thinking along the line of not destroying weapons but keeping them safe for the
future generations to have a touch with Bougainville history.
These are
the issues now Bougainville is caught with. Though weapons disposal stage 2 in
Paragraph 329 (Endorsement of Weapons Disposal Plan), Bougainville had only are
50/50 percent success rate. But Bougainvilleans are not reckless gun welders
against themselves in the post-conflict Bougainville.
How did the USA break away from britain, it was through guns, it was through a civilian militia,where every civilian had the right to be armed..in such a situation the country can never be held hostage under another nation trying to invade or conquer. Hitler never invaded switzerland because he was afraid of the swiss civilian population being armed, hitler also said that the first step to conquering a country is to disarm its people. The mainstream media only tries its best to make guns look very evil because they want people disarmed all over the world..why?? because the mainstream media are big corporation which are also owned by the ones that also own mineral companies, or have shares in mining companies..therefore they would not want people armed as armed people can resist being exploited. Remember if all citizens are armed, crime rates drop!!!, it is only when a few are armed then they have the advantage and crime rates rise...but if all are armed then criminals fear trying to cause crimes, also politicians will be kept in check as they will fear the population enough not to become corrupt.
ReplyDeleteBougainville had no voice without those guns, without shedding blood to gain those arms...you give them away now is the same as giving away your voice,your independence, your freedom,...it is the same as dishonouring all your heroes who went to war with bows and arrows against machine guns inorder to gain arms for you,those that died for you to be armed and equal and heard.
ReplyDelete